Skip to content

Hey Lee Hsien Loong, Where’s Our Money Dude?

Every year whether it is the National Day Rally or the PAP Convention, our Dear Leeder dusts down last year’s speech, changes the dates, and gives the same address again and again without any sense of irony.

Since LHL controls the media we have to listen to the usual inanities about how GDP growth is better than expected and how Singapore will stay prosperous in contrast to democracies as long as the people stay united and cohesive (read this as giving PAP 100% of the seats in Parliament). Never mind that our GDP is an artificial construct driven by tax arbitrage and having no connection with the average Singaporean’s living standards.

This year was no exception. Fresh from jetting around the region to the APEC and ASEAN summits in his or his wife’s very own dedicated business jet,  whose financing is as mysterious as the Lee family assets or Ho Ching’s remuneration, Lee Hsien Loong returned to his usual themes.

The  most hackneyed was that as social and infrastructure spending was rising, taxes would have to go up. He says this every year and every year it is equally mystifying as there is no reason for it.  As I have pointed out in frequent blog posts, to say that the Government’s true fiscal position is exceedingly comfortable is the understatement of the century. The 2017 Yearbook of Statistics (see here) gives the General Government cash surplus since 2009 as about $140 billion. The total General Government cash surplus since 2007 is over $220 billion. That is about $100,000 for every adult Singaporean.

But this does not begin to tell the full story. The Yearbook surplus is on a cash basis rather than an accrual basis, which is the basis recommended since 2001 by the IMF’s Government Financial Statistics (GFS) Manual. So it undoubtedly underestimates the total surplus by a substantial amount. Only actual cash paid to the Government, whether in the form of dividends, taxes or capital receipts is included. In particular the figure does not include the surpluses of public corporations such as GIC and Temasek which are not part of the General Government sector.

At the last election I proposed spending $6 billion more per year on social programmes such as an old age pension and child benefit but was met with a chorus from state media of how I would pay for this. In the midst of so much public sector largesse this is a ridiculous question. It is true we have a rule that only current revenues from taxes and fees plus up to 50% of the long term returns of Temasek and GIC can be used to finance both current and capital expenditure but even with this rule (which makes no economic sense) such additional spending would be easily affordable. At present most of the transfers from Temasek and GIC which are supposed to be available to finance expenditure are in fact recycled into long term funds which do not represent current spending at all. I have written on this extensively over the years and you can find some of the links below.

Of course when LHL talks about taxes having to rise he does not mean the top rate of income tax or corporation tax. Nor is he going to take any action to remove the glaring loopholes which favour the wealthy such as the lack of any capital gains tax, tax on dividends, interest or investment income. Like Trump, he wants to ensure that the tax system favours his family interests. I am no socialist and would prefer taxes to be as low as possible but I believe that in the interests of economic efficiency and equity the tax base should be as broad as possible. What LHL is talking about is undoubtedly raising the GST rate, maybe to 10% or higher, even though there is  absolutely no revenue need. GST is a regressive tax and while there may be some economic arguments in its favour it should be offset by transfers to less well-off Singaporeans. This has never happened.

So , before going on about tax increases, LHL should open the books and let us see why they are necessary and if they are, why he cannot reduce the unfairness of our tax system first. The Government should also amend the absurd rule that investment needs to be financed out of current revenue and move towards producing a balance sheet that puts a value on infrastructure and other publicly owned assets like land.

As long as Singaporeans can be bought for a few hundred dollars worth of GST vouchers the likelihood of finding out the true state of the Government’s finances are somewhere between nil and zero.


Budget 2016: Stuck in a Car in the Fog. Who to Ask for Directions?

What is the Real Surplus?

How To Make A Surplus Disappear Without Anyone Noticing!

Smoke and Mirrors in the Government’s Accounts





  1. Hello Kenneth
    I am an ex Singaporean left home in 1970. While the Govt was still reasonable. I have watched over the years the deterioration and the antics of PAP. What a bunch of crooks pretending to be govt ministers . Elevated through nepotism I.E through the military. With what knowledge can these so call ministers do short of suing somebody if they are displeased with a comment made . Are their skin so paper thin ? Well they should not be in politics . I have watch how the govt fleeced the people on COE, the gantry charged . Yeah no transparency on finance. How much did they rack on from the casino? You do not read or hear about money collected and distribution. You have those community chest people selling flags to collect money . The govt boast of wealth like you said is it distributed to the needy . ?The old collect cardboards not for excersiseing their bodies. The lack of a govt pension means these people have to beg from their children if they want some money. These are the people who build Singapore up . They are the pioneers, only recognised by the yearly Hong Bao. It is disgusting. LHL is the highest paid PM in the world not even Obama who governed how many millions in the USA and how many states and Territory do not collect a million annual income . On a small island of 6.5 million he is over paid for a lousy job of running the country . The Australian PM collects less than$500 p/a . Mind you he travels with the special kit out airforce plane . Singaporeans are so gullible. PAP stands for pay and pay. As a senior citizen I pay half my car registration and husband the same . We have subsided utilities as well as rates on our property.
    At any given retail shops if they display a seniors discount we receive 10% of. Certain petrol stations discount 4% on your fuel. Every bit counts. Yes we paid high taxes but the returns are 10 folds . My husband had a pace maker installed. He went in as a public patient and had the best cardiologist that did the operation all for free . Free consultation annually. The operation would have cost us at least $20,000. Plus the Dr.s fee.
    Why would all those expat Singaporean wants to make a home in Singapore. When their life style is affordable, you can own as many cars as you wished .Unaffordable landed properties million dollar appartments who can afford that. Govt flats are so expensive , when your neighbour sneeze you could hand them a tissue paper to wipe their nose.. the floors are so thin you hear stomping above you and rolling coins or marbles . I have families still living in Singapore, it breaks my heart when I see their struggle to maintain a business . I am glad I made the decision to leave in 1970. I have travelled widely and live in two continents. Australia is my home and very happy too. I enjoy the comforts of a clean environment.
    Thank you for your post . I remember your father and all the old guards . Much respect for them . Rather disappoint at how LKY turned out now the family is in disarray . It goes to say that when the head rears its ugly head the tail follow suits


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: