Skip to content

Were the Bungalows Empty?-Addendum


It should be noted that the Straits Times article of May12th reported that the properties were empty for years before the Ministers moved in: “Meanwhile 31 Ridout Road had been vacant for more than six years” and “26 Ridout Road, the Agency said the property had been vacant for more than four years”. I used the terms “for many years” based on the reported SLA statement. However, sources close to the location on Ridout Road have informed me that at least one of the properties may have been empty but ihad been inhabited by an expat hedge fund manager who was then squeezed out by unreasonable terms imposed by SLA, which as we know is headed by Shanmugam. This freed up the property for the senior Ministers. Were the same onerous terms applied by Shanmugam to his own tenancy? Whatever went on here somehow the properties became attractive enough and stable enough that the the Ministers were able to confidently make them their main residence. We can only look at the photographic evidence and draw our own conclusions.

I can’t verify the neighbourhood source but the UK government website Companies House publicly lists two corporate officers with a business correspondence address registered as 26 Ridout road. Questions need to be asked about their tenancy. I am reminded of the Bible tale of King David who sent Uriah to the front line where the fighting was fiercest with instructions to withdraw from him so that he would be killed, in order to free up Uriah’s wife Bathsheba for himself.

2 Comments »

  1. “…I am reminded of the Bible tale of King David who sent Uriah to the front line where the fighting was fiercest with instructions to withdraw from him so that he would be killed, in order to free up Uriah’s wife Bathsheba for himself.”

    Something I am familiar with. Sounds apt if so-called hedge fund manager was intentionally squeezed out by high or unreasonable imposition of rental cost by SLA; but not apt if rental cost was at a level consistent with the value of the property. If the hedge fund manager was quoted a rental cost that was reasonable, in terms of the market value of the property, was this reasonableness being applied, to either of these ministers? Or did SLA act with unreasonableness, by lowering the rental cost for one or both of these ministers?

    Like

Leave a Reply